Get Started
Get Started
Overlapping funds
Vise sees through to underlying holdings. Two ETFs with 98% overlap are treated as equivalent, no taxable swap. Vestmark treats them as distinct tickers and can trigger a gain-realizing trade for no portfolio benefit.
Single page execution
On Vise, the advisor goes from proposal to execution in one workflow. At Vestmark, the portfolio manager has to navigate through multiple pages to see what they need, verify the system output, and then execute.
Cash buffers are not invisible
On Vise, you set up an automated distribution, we sell on a tax-efficient basis on the scheduled date, and if there’s no activity within 15 days we notify and reinvest. In Vestmark, there is no visible way to set and monitor that recurring cash need alongside the model allocation. The advisor ends up maintaining a parallel spreadsheet.
Automated transition
Vise pulls the full book from custodial feeds at lot level. The solver segments by opportunity and quantifies the value per account. Advisors review and approve in a collaborative workflow. Vestmark: export, send, wait, receive, verify manually. One firm spent nine months before reaching UAT.

Frequently asked questions
Is it easy to switch?
Do I have to migrate all accounts at once?
What about my existing models?
Which custodians does Vise support?
How is Vise different from Vestmark?
Can Vise help migrate a book off Vestmark?






